Tuesday 23 October 2012

▽ THRESHOLDS @ TATE




As part of the biennial Thresholds at Tate Liverpool aims to decipher the uncertain boundaries of personal, geo-political and cultural identities. It is effectively split into three sections – Stranger than self, Shifting Boundaries and Territories in the Making. I was particularly drawn to Shifting Boundaries as it investigated worldwide travel, or in other words, tourism. This was an interesting subject matter I believe, as I had seldom come across it before within other parts of the biennial. In terms of the curatorial approach of the exhibition, however, I felt quite critical; for example, in one area of the exhibition all of the photographic pieces had been placed together. This was detrimental I feel, as it made all of the photographic pieces emerge into one and thus made it hard to distinguish between them. I believe that categorising pieces by aesthetic or medium is an extremely lacklustre curatorial foundation to employ. As the photographic works were what captured my interest within the exhibition I was quite disappointed that they were curated in such a predictable way.

The two pieces, which predominantly caught my attention, were Common Sense by Martin Parr and Sophie Calle’s series of works. Martin Parr’s Common Sense is essentially a vast portfolio of colour laser copies of photographs, which had been taken and accumulated over four years (1995-1999). What struck me the most about the photographs were their lurid colour – it gives them a very kitsch, tawdry aesthetic, which reflects the theme of global consumerism quite effectively. Although the images are quite tawdry and are of things which most of us have seen before, Parr has in some laudable way made these proletarian images possess a picturesque quality. I think it is truly commendable how Parr has taken everyday images but tried to capture an essence of beauty and importance within them – this is something of a Warholian concept, which I believe will always sustain power because it means producing art that everyone can resonate with.

Calle’s series of pieces from her project The Hotel compromise both photograph and text. They were produced as a result of Calle’s previous employment as a chambermaid in a Venetian hotel. In the course of her cleaning duties she began to examine the personal belongings of hotel guests. Inexplicably voyeuristic, Calle would often find herself reading diaries, postcards, letters and notes, as well as searching through suitcases, wardrobes and drawers. What is even more shocking is that Calle would sometimes go to the unbelievable extent of spraying herself with hotel guest’s perfumes, applying on their make up and eating their leftovers. There were also times when Calle would stand outside rooms and eavesdrop into occupant’s conversations, and other times when she would peer into rooms to catch a glimpse of the guests. Calle’s pieces seem somewhat part performance art and part photographic; her performance however is obviously a private one, no one knows of it until after the tangible art is created. The undeniably voyeuristic nature of Calle’s piece reminded me of the work of Kohei Yoshiyuki’s that is currently exhibiting at the Open Eye gallery.  However, Yoshiyuki was stationary to the voyeurism he encountered, were as Calle is un-shamefully central to it. I think voyeurism is an interesting subject matter to explore considering how the Internet and social networking has today took away our means of privacy. Calle investigating the private aspects of the hotel guest’s lives can be seen as a figurative for those today who use the internet or social networking sites as a means to peer into the lives of others.

▽ MARINA ABRAMOVIC




Marina Abramovic, the acclaimed “grand-mother of performance art” is a laudable example of the self-sacrificing artist who is more than often inclined to surpass boundaries that many artists seldom dare to transcend. The Artist is present is a documental film currently screening at FACT, which profiles Abramovic as she prepares for her show at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. The title of the film reflects the name of the piece that it primarily regards – The Artist is Present; this piece lasted three months at MOMA and invited the public to take turns sitting opposite Abramovic, keeping her gaze for as long as they wished.  One may regards this as a simple concept for a piece of performance art, but this documental film reveals its true potency with many of Abramovic’s sitters having had extremely emotional responses - some even moved to tears.

Personally, I found the film extremely emotional and I was particularly enamoured by its brief regard to Abramovic’s former relationship with fellow performance artist Ulay (Frank Uwe Laysiepen).  Arguably the most moving part of film is when Ulay pays a visit to Abramovic’s exhibition and becomes amongst one of the many sitters. Abramovic opens her eyes, and to her surprise sitting facing her is her lost love, Ulay. One undoubtedly feels the powerful connection they share and is touched as they gaze adoringly at one another through tear-filled eyes of devotion and love. Though they share no discourse there is such a magnitude of emotion resonating between them that withholds so much power. Ironically, this scenario was an uncanny immitation of the performance piece, Nightsea Crossing in which Abramovic and Ulay sat silent and motionless facing one other for several days.  

Everyone whom I have spoken to with regards to the film has positively responded to it and I would denote this success as a direct result of its poignancy. We are invited into the most intimate areas of Abramovic’s personal life, such as her love life and childhood; therefore, just as to the sitters within 
The Artist is Present she is made extremely vulnerable to us as viewers also, and we are thus inevitably inclined to react empathetically.  In my opinion, if an artist is able to encompass emotion within their work they can obtain an infinite power over the viewer, and Abramovic, I feel, clearly exemplifies this. Over the past 40 years Abramovic has been continuously bothered by the question “But why is this art?” and considering the passion and effort that goes into her work I think this is truly saddening. If I was to answer this question for Abramovic I would suggest that her work is ‘art’ because it pushes boundaries and opens minds; it challenges conventions and possesses a thriving degree of emotion. Abramovic’s incomprehensible strength and meritorious dedication to her work completely enthralled me. Her good humour and colourful personality made the film as entertaining as it was insightful. On the whole, I would definitely recommend this film, as it evidently demonstrates why performance art should not have its artistic quality questioned as much as it sadly is, even within today’s progressive landscape of contemporary art.