Running
now for two consecutive years the John Moore's Painting Prize China is a recently
developed branch of the established Liverpool-based competition. Just as the
main competition it has been significantly encompassed into this years
Biennial.
During a visit to
the Walker art gallery’s Talk Tuesdays I
received an intriguing and informative walk-through of the pieces exhibited
within both the John Moores painting prize and China painting prize. When
one visits the two exhibitions, which reside next to each other they will
notice a somewhat conspicuous difference between them. This was specifically
brought to the attention of one lady, who had also attended the weekly talk.
When we were permitted to offer questions regarding all of the works she
questioned why there seemed a notable difference in so-called traditional
artistic ability between the two exhibitions. She suggested that the works from
the China competition implied greater artistic talent and skill. The exhibition
guide’s response to this was both insightful and interesting. Her response
denoted that art education in China today differs greatly from that in Britain;
it is still very much concerned with placing emphasis on developing atypical
artistic skill and becoming a practiced artisan. Whilst Chinese art students
may still attend life-drawing classes, British art students are subjected to a
curriculum that enables them to work in more liberal and conceptually-driven
way. It was certainly engrossing to see the cultural differences in art
education reflected between the two exhibitions, however, I did not believe, as
my fellow talk visitor did, that the Chinese art was superior to the more
conceptual pieces of the John Moores prize simply because it reflected
classical artistic skill and talent more directly. In my opinion, art
does not have to possess conventional aesthetic value or demonstrate high
artistic ability in order to be recognised as ‘good art’. I firmly believe that
a profound concept and an effective expression of subject matter should be
valued equally as much as an artist’s technical ability.
Subsequent to the
interesting discussion regarding the juxtaposition of the two exhibitions I
acquainted myself more with the prize winner of the China competition.
The winning piece is by the artist Nie Zhengji and is entitled Being. It discusses the representation of migrant
workers in China - individuals from impoverished areas who relocate to
urbanised regions in search of employment. Within the piece Zhengji implies
that even though migrant workers are practically central to the
urbanisation of particular regions in China, they are not rightfully
appreciated by society. Zhengji has also suggested in relation to this piece
that migrant workers in China are unjustly overlooked and detached from the
city’s wealth and prosperity. The grey, melancholic palette incorporated
into this piece immediately reflects and embodies the despondent subject matter
addressed. The figure within the piece possesses no face and practically fades
into the dark, sombre landscape in which it inhabits. This seems a clear
reference to the lack of voice and significance that one supposedly feels as a
migrant worker in China. Into the distance of the bleak landscape discreet
objects, which arguably symbolise the commercial prosperity and
wealth of a city can be seen; these objects are conceivably a taxicab and
flashing city lights. Zhengjie may have intentionally made these objects a
diminutive aspect of the painting, and seemingly distant from the painting’s
figure, in order to suggest that the commercial wealth and prosperity of the
city is not something that the everyday migrant worker
is familiarised with.
Being,
reminded me a great deal of the work of Lui Bolin. Widely known as the ‘Invisible
man’ Bolin camouflages himself into his surroundings in an attempt to
artistically manifest the idea of being a societal outsider. The idea of having
no societal importance or political voice forms the foundation for both Bolin’s
work and Zhengji’s prize winning piece. Reading into the context of this
year’s John Moores China pieces, it seems that they all to some degree discuss
political or sociological issues. Consequentially, it seems that gaining
an esteemed political voice through art is a common shared goal for today’s
contemporary artists of China.
No comments:
Post a Comment